A633.5.3.RB_FogartyShawn

            This exercise was a colorful illustration of how complexity and chaos can appear daunting to the organization and their masses but in reality once individuals are cut loose to operate the simplistic nature of how everything plays out is demonstrated to have been counter-intuitive. The exercise shows that even complex and chaotic tasks can be accomplished without excessive controls. Further, the exercise paves the way for the eight principles to shine. The exercise clearly demonstrates that an individual with a clear objective in a complex system works well with only a few simple rules and clear boundaries along with being granted the freedom to maneuver based on continuous feedback can easily achieve their underlying purpose.

            My understanding of chaos theory was rather text-book at first. It took a while to adapt the various models and outlines within Chapter 5 of Complex adaptive leadership: Embracing paradox and uncertainty (Obolensky, 2010), to my own organization and daily operations. I certainly have a better understanding and the reflection this week has made me realize sometimes less it more. In truly complex and chaotic environments the leader with an absolute plan is surely setting themselves up for failure.    

            This exercise and reflection has included the following implications on my organizational strategy. Standard Operating Procedures need to be reviewed and amended appropriately to maintain within the current operational window. This is mostly to enable those who can operate independently towards a clear objective rather than limit individuals. Second, excessive boundaries will not allow individuals to focus any more clearly on their target, but perhaps place blinders on the big picture. Third, ensure feedback loops are established to promote a continuous cycle and not one-way reporting. If subordinates are able to report critical issues to operations ensure they know those issues are received and being resolved and further when resolved.

            Closing, a recent discussion with a company commander, having explained the exercise left her assumption like many that the task was overly complicated. She was further perplexed that the natural order evolved quite easily despite minimal inputs. The rationale that a need did not exist for a specific leader further left her deeply puzzled. I gauged her understanding and exposure to the polyarchy style of leadership to be very minimal but I imagine the next time she has a complex or chaotic day she’ll think twice about how to make it smooth out.

Obolensky, N. (2010). Complex adaptive leadership: Embracing paradox and uncertainty.           
            Farnham, Surrey: Gower.