A634.2.4.RB_FogartyShawn

            LaFollette (2007) discusses In Chapter 2 of The practice of ethics two styles of reasons in relation to ethical decision making and choices. The first is consequentialism which focused on the consequences of our actions. The second style of reasoning is deontology which takes it a step or two further by defining our actions in relation to rules and principles. Overall the two styles of reasoning set the basis for ethical reasoning.

            I find consequentialism to be practical however insufficient by itself. The context of merely looking only at the consequences seemingly would be linked to only short lived success but ultimately failure. Consequences can not be the deciding factor alone, but should be utilized in a decision support system matrix as options are evaluated. This style of reasoning is important especially as it would force some to consider second and third order effects which could potentially have undesirable consequences otherwise ignored. Another credible facet to consequentialism is it takes into account three elements which allow the situation to be tailored. First, it considers which consequences are to be accounted. Second, how much weight is applied to each included consequences. Lastly, how it impacts the deliberation process (Lafollette, 2007).

            The other primary style of reasoning about ethical issues is deontology. Deontology, as Lafollette (2007) points out, has “two marks in its favor.” It incorporates the subjectivity about one’s moral beliefs, how they acquired them and how they apply them. Second, it’ principle rival, consequentialism is considers to be significantly flawed (Lafollette, 2007). The shaping aspect about deontology is that is defines one morality independently of its consequences.  

            If I had to choose between the two, I would choose both. I believe critical thinking can be utilized to encapsulate both consequences and morality about the situation to make a most informed decision. The hybrid state of reasoning would select a little from column A and a little from Column B. I think that ethical issues and decisions should have a moral compass to guide the decision maker but also include an understanding of the consequences to incorporate any subsequent effects from that decision.

 

 

LaFollette, H. (2007). The practice of ethics. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Pub.